3 Comments
User's avatar
Vance Nannini's avatar

I had forgotten all about PAARC. 😂

Expand full comment
Rachel Baldes's avatar

When I was in school it seemed like we lost around two weeks of instruction to testing every year. My daughter is finishing 8th grade and it's closer to 6 weeks. Some of these are MAPS testing which I actually don't mind as much, but it seems a bit much. How many times do they need to get results that say the majority of students can't read at grade level? And that spending 6 weeks of class time on testing how far from grade level they are might be a waste of time? I personally feel like higher reading scores will automatically raise scores on every other subject, I don't know if research will bear that out or not. Maybe not so much math, but some even there.

Expand full comment
Andy Spears's avatar

But by recycling and repackaging these terrible ideas, money can be made - foundations will be encouraged to give to support the "new" version of "let's find out why schools aren't great." In a 30-year ed reform career, 2-4 iterations of the same crap should get you to a nice retirement - or a well-paid job at one of those foundations that used to fund your "work."

Expand full comment