While I hang out with the Board of Directors, the Institute CMO is out canvassing our side of town for the Harris campaign, an activity that she enjoys slightly more than having her teeth pulled, b, as she said, she doesn't want November 6 to come and feel as if there was something more she could have done.
The Pew research is interesting, but at the same time it doesn’t mean much. Polling studies simply cannot dig into the levels of nuance and shades of meaning underlying this subject. It is often highly reductive. When responses are limited to y/n or better/worse, small differences tend to be magnified into artificially large divides.
If you look at the questions in any sort of thoughtful manner, none can be answered simply. Every one would require at least a small explanation of your response.
I can easily see commentators and politicians using this as “scientific” support for almost any opinion they want to put forth.
The Pew research is interesting, but at the same time it doesn’t mean much. Polling studies simply cannot dig into the levels of nuance and shades of meaning underlying this subject. It is often highly reductive. When responses are limited to y/n or better/worse, small differences tend to be magnified into artificially large divides.
If you look at the questions in any sort of thoughtful manner, none can be answered simply. Every one would require at least a small explanation of your response.
I can easily see commentators and politicians using this as “scientific” support for almost any opinion they want to put forth.