IMO this data tends to support the arguments FOR eliminating the Federal DOE. The DOE largely functions as a funding conduit, shifting $$ from one state to another. This tax subsidy allows those recipient states to keep their taxes low and pretend to be budget conscious & pro-business. I’ve not seen any evidence that they are unable, just unwilling, to raise sufficient funds to properly educate their kids.
IMO this data tends to support the arguments FOR eliminating the Federal DOE. The DOE largely functions as a funding conduit, shifting $$ from one state to another. This tax subsidy allows those recipient states to keep their taxes low and pretend to be budget conscious & pro-business. I’ve not seen any evidence that they are unable, just unwilling, to raise sufficient funds to properly educate their kids.