It's so frustrating to see charters pick and choose when it's convenient.
They take public taxpayer dollars, but don't have to serve the public.
They are privately owned and managed, and it’s tiring to see charter advocates pretent they are anything but private schools without (explicitly charging) tuition.
I think states will tend to go in the opposite direction. By and large, they appear to want to divest themselves of responsibility for educating kids. Voters are sending mixed messages, at best, on their commitment to and willingness to properly fund quality education. States could choose to bypass the whole issue by abandoning all pretense of authorizing, establishing or regulating schools and sending the funds directly to the parents. Not a choice I’d endorse, but a logical extension of the path being followed.
It's so frustrating to see charters pick and choose when it's convenient.
They take public taxpayer dollars, but don't have to serve the public.
They are privately owned and managed, and it’s tiring to see charter advocates pretent they are anything but private schools without (explicitly charging) tuition.
Anti privatization education law is my dream, what advice would you have to get into this sub field?
I am prepping for law school admissions, but Ed law is so niche it's hard to know where to start!
I think states will tend to go in the opposite direction. By and large, they appear to want to divest themselves of responsibility for educating kids. Voters are sending mixed messages, at best, on their commitment to and willingness to properly fund quality education. States could choose to bypass the whole issue by abandoning all pretense of authorizing, establishing or regulating schools and sending the funds directly to the parents. Not a choice I’d endorse, but a logical extension of the path being followed.