Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Susan Fuller's avatar

Good reading instruction based on evidence looks different in an elementary classroom than it does in a high school. It should be different, and this perspective from a high school teacher is directed at the wrong target. The issue she has here is the claim that our students are not doing well in school based on unrealistic goals set by politicians and not educators.

But the recognition that most students cannot simply intuit decoding text by looking at it while someone reads it to them is well researched. Elementary students need explicit instruction in phonics, vocabulary, semantics, and they need teachers to model reading skills. There is a lot of evidence behind SOS including MRI scans of changes in the brain that happen when dyslexic students receive proper instruction. Curriculum publishers made a lot of money LLI and Guided Reading they stand to lose a lot if they can no longer sell their wares to schools. The Science of Reading is a movement to make sure that teachers are taught the content and techniques to support reading rather than handed a curriculum and told to follow it blindly. There is a larger discussion to be had about teacher training, professional development and teachers as experts. The idea that anyone can teach if you give them the right curriculum is a large part of the problem.

Expand full comment

No posts