Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Linda R Sanders's avatar

So parents want complete control over the books their kids check out from the library, but it is OK if a kid is working 20 hours a week without parental permission because parents are just a roadblock? It boggles the mind.

Expand full comment
Bill Whitten's avatar

While there is certainly value in teens acquiring work experiences, it wasn’t school that diminished those opportunities. It was liability and therefore profitability. Immature kids are simply more likely to have accidents on the job and their financial consequences are higher. Combine that with costs of maintaining safe workplaces and the value of inexperienced teen labor wasn’t sufficiently profitable.

However, that calculus has changed. Note how these bills dovetail into other so called workplace “reforms”. Workman’s Comp - cut back. OSHA - cut back. Tort reformed. Unions crippled. The list goes on.

The other part of this is civic/ social responsibility. At one time, employers - at least those who considered themselves part of the community - felt a civic duty to hire teens not as cheap labor, but contributing to forming competent adults. This would build future customers and employees. Faceless corporations are only concerned with maximizing today’s profits. Labor is just a cost to be minimized. They expect someone else to train workers for them. The fundamental premise of capitalism is to socialize costs and privatize profits.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts