Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jenna Vandenberg's avatar

Oh, I remember (with horror!) being a first year teacher and having this argument with a 30 year veteran teacher (who also happened to be my mother in law). She made the same arguments you do here and it still took a few school years and a few principals to convince me. How embarrassing.

Great article, as always.

Expand full comment
Mark Grabe's avatar

The rock star label when applied to educators always irritates me. It brings to mind individuals who are showy and quirky and rebellious. Do such characteristics translate into student achievement? Does one have to be entertaining and popular to be effective? Are educators who simply have a deep understanding of the content they teach and are capable of communicating it effectively undervalued given the rockstar mindset? If schools had the luxury of hiring for rockstar characteristics would school effectiveness improve if such individuals made up the entire staff? I spent most of my career in higher education and the equivalent at that level was student ratings. An issue with student ratings was that while the surveys contained many questions administrators and merit committees tended to really on a single item asking for a summary judgment. So much additional data in this environment was available - items on the survey and possibly important covariates such as the average grade awarded, but such variables are very seldom actually used. The definition of quality instruction is seldom actually defined or more importantly evaluated.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts